If you (the reader) were in this situation, this information could be used to negotiate if you were still interested in the license agreement. Let me explain… If you decide to negotiate in this case, I would suggest not to mention that you are aware of your ignorance. Instead, I would create a very competent, friendly and professional response by requesting specific revisions. For example, you could support them to change the contract with a “step-deal” so that you offer your songs “for free” only for the use of the festival. If the film has been recorded for theatrical (or foreign) distribution or DVD (domestic or foreign), you will receive a specified amount of money on that date. A “step-deal” is really just a way to get paid if a step is taken, so it could be an important step. I just used the theatrical version and the distribution for illustration purposes. There are many other ways to negotiate here without one stage of the agreement. Of course, you could ask for money in advance, or you could tell them that you want the agreement to be only for festivals and for all other uses to be negotiated in good faith, etc. Whatever you decide to write, make sure it`s professional and sounds like you`ve done it a million times.
You can most likely assume that she is not an expert and you may not understand the terms you use, so you write phrases like “we could apply a default step agreement” or “Can you change the CD section of the soundtrack so that I get the standard royalty rate?” By writing these kinds of sentences and using the word “standard,” it means that you have done so many times, which will scare you or allow you to get your way. Or he can give him his Google concepts, which is why it`s important that you`re not full of. Note: This strategy does not work with someone more experienced. The most important thing to see here is who you are dealing with. Chances are that this woman doesn`t have the money to give you, or she`s not willing to pay you, no matter what her financial situation. But you never know. I will leave the trading strategy for another blog post because my hands are tired of entering. The contracting parties determine whether the party granting the song`s license can sell its license. This would determine, for example, whether the film producer could sell his right to use the song to another film producer to another film producer. This is a good opportunity to hammer at home a point you remember well: the intended use of a copyrighted work makes a huge difference between the tires they have to jump and the rules that apply.
If you want to use the song, poem, painting, music video or any other copyrighted work of another person, the first question you usually need to address is, “How do you plan to use it?” It is more than a small detail; it will often dictate the terms of your agreement. So don`t forget to start by specifying how the work is used. So I read this contract, and my meter turns the. The first thing that seems strange to me is that it is mentioned under the “Grant of License” section, it mentions videotapes and video discs, but no mention of DVDs. Without reading further, I know that this contract was adapted from one of those free models found online. For those of you who don`t know it, there are a lot of free music business deals that are published on the Internet. However, you are usually free for a reason and are generally quite outdated and not incredibly healthy legal. As I continue to read this contract, I notice more fortuitous things, such as this fact, that no financial compensation is mentioned and that it does not contain the nuances that I am used to with a standard “airtight” licensing agreement.